This article was written when Thomson Scientific was known as the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI)
Imagine that you have just completed a search and obtained a set of bibliographic
information that satisfies your needs precisely. You may have collected a handful
of articles—or hundreds. Now, imagine how you will deal with these papers.
In many cases, information retrieval is just the first step in a search. The
next step—especially if you are facing a large collection of papers—is analysis.
Because information users often need only a specific
subset of Thomson Scientific
data, Thomson Scientific's Research Group accommodates
these requests by creating customized, relationally
structured datasets to suit specific needs. In 1994,
the Research Group added an interface—the Article
Summary Interface—to these datasets to
help users analyze the data easily. This bibliometric
interface is a Windows®-based
tool that implements both basic and complex queries.
The Article Summary Interface features a different
kind of access and different functionalities than
those offered with other Thomson Scientific products.
The interface is designed to work with the relational
database, allowing you to manipulate any of the papers'
features (e.g., author names, citation counts, author
addresses). Specific relational database software
packages such as Paradox®
or Access® are not needed because their capabilities are built
into the software. The interface also allows for tabular and graphical presentations
of the statistics.
Types of Analyses
The interface is based on a modular component programming model. In time,
these components will be interchangeable. For now, each interface comes complete
with queries that handle both basic and complex analyses. The basic queries
are the citation summaries, and the underlying dataset, as well as the needs
of the user, determine which ones of these are most useful (see Figure 1). The
more complex queries include: citation frequency distribution, citation time
series, intercitation, and collaboration statistics, and a variety of manipulations
at the article level. The Highly Cited Articles query, for example, is a listing
of papers for the underlying dataset. For datasets that contain bibliographic
information on the citing papers—such as the Personal Citation Report (PCR)—citing
summary analysis of citing papers are included in addition to the
other queries. All of this data for the interface can be updated every six months.

—->
Figure 1
Another product that runs on the Article Summary Interface is High Impact Papers
(HIPS). It is a bibliographic and citation database of the 300 most-cited papers
of each year from 1981 through 1994. Neurosciences, immunology, and molecular
biology and genetics are the three topics that are currently offered, but the
Research Group can construct a High Impact Papers database for any field or
topic.
Applications
The Article Summary Interface acts as a decision support system.
Each of the queries available opens different analytical possibilities—each
helping to answer specific types of questions. And, with the article-based interface,
you can track trends and actually see the papers responsible for the trends.
The Highly Cited Articles query presents a list of all of the papers for the
underlying dataset, and the papers are ranked by total number of citations received.
By clicking on a specific article of interest, you can view additional information
about the article (see Figure 2). The query can be restricted to monitor something
specific, such as the number of highly cited articles in a specific journal.
This would be very useful to the researcher who is considering where to publish
the results of a study.

—->
Figure 2
Journal editors themselves might benefit from using the Summary by Journal and
the Article Type Summary query. Not only can editors check on their own journal
to see which types of article—research article, proceedings papers, meeting
abstracts, letters, or notes—garnered the highest number of citations, they
could also check on the competition and perhaps adjust their article selection
process.
The Summary by Author query is particularly useful for comparative evaluation
of individual authors. It summarizes publication, citation, and citations-per-paper
statistics for each author of each paper in a dataset. Additional evaluation
is possible by accessing the Highly Cited Article query; total cites as well
as expected cites are displayed here.
The Time Series query computes the number of papers, number of citations received,
and the citations per paper for each year from 1981 through 1994 in the dataset.
The statistics can also be divided into 5-year moving windows or a 14-year period.
The data, which can be presented in table and graph form, portray performance
for a specific period and therefore allow for comparisons between specific periods
and for trend analysis.
The Citation Frequency Distribution query shows the number of articles cited
at different frequencies, from zero to the maximum number of times a paper was
cited in the defined period.
The Collaboration by Country and by Organization queries compute the number
of papers produced by authors working in two countries or two organizations,
respectively, and sort the country or organization pairs either by the number
of coauthored papers or alphabetically by the name of the country or organization.
These analyses reveal, for a subset of papers, a network of activity and cooperation.
Potential Users
The Article Summary Interface has many benefits for analysts.
In general, it serves the needs of people who must monitor and track data on
science at an aggregate level, including administrators, planning and development
officers, and policy makers. Depending on the dataset, other users may include
bench scientists, university provosts, librarians, or research & development
managers in industry.
The user has the flexibility of presenting data in tables or graphs. Whether
you use the data to gain a keener understanding of information yourself or use
it to suggest a course of action to others, the interface provides a new perspective
on bibliographic data.
Conclusions
The Article Summary Interface reveals valuable information hidden
in a dataset. It makes the data accessible in a variety of new ways.
The interface is both easy to use and capable of answering complex analytical
queries. In the future, new analytical options will appear in upgrades to the
Article Summary Interface.
Dr. Henry Small
Director, Contract Research
Thomson Scientific
Margaret Ring Gillock
Science Writer